Cheong’s article discussed three argument which I disagree thus feel
the need to reflect. Cheong stated that faith based tweets and mobile mediated
prayers help to build a sense of closeness which I cannot agree in full. It is
true to say that these modern day outlets of expression do give instant gratification
and as Cheong justifies this use of modern media as it, “preserves
self-awareness of sanctified moments during normal, everyday activities.”
However despite the internet’s benefit to access to global community in
seconds, the fact is that physical interaction is not occurring which de-humanises
the whole experience. I understand Cheong’s argument that religious experience
and embodiment can be achieved quicker, which I would never dispute as a bad
thing. However, I dislike the notion that it creates a “closeness.” What’s
being lost by this practice is communication and personal interaction which is a
skill I feel is being lost in this age of technology where speech is being
drowned out by constant taping.
What positives I have to say on the piece is that Cheong is correct in
saying that this practice of instant tweet/facebook/blogs allows for followers
to express their identity and reaffirm their belief not just to their social
network but to themselves. Furthermore I agree that the process of blogging religious
thought would take more concentration thus more commitment then just merely
sitting and listening to a service. Religious blogging gets people to really
think “why” they believe what they do which is excellent for self-awareness.
